|
|
|
Universal Declaration of human rights according to the Prophetism carries on in its elucidation. We took into consideration the first two issues namely: the right to Live, the second, which is the closest to my heart, Love, we now come to the third fundamental right, which combined with the other two represent the three most important things of the existence, as mentioned above: Live, Love and the Death... which everyone must be given, after a certain age to terminally ill with great physical suffering, the inalienable right to die.
The fourth I'm going to talk about in this context is the Search for Truth (Pursuit of truth).
I reaffirm the third fundamental right. When a person feels to have lived long enough and has serious terminal pathologies and does no longer wishes to live unnecessarily in suffering; when he knows his tomorrow is only another day of empty suffering for himself and others, then he has the right to leave this body: it's his fundamental right.
Life belongs to the individual not to a hospital policy that considers a useless big expense, where who benefits are only politics and pharmaceutical companies.
Nobody, I mean nobody, should avoid dying who no longer wants to continue living in pain in a bed with unspeakable tortures done by medicines to try drugs or other mischief on a suffering body.
Indeed, in every hospital there should exist a particular section where those who are at the end of life, in throes of suffering can relax in advance and peacefully through therapy of no pain so to relax and think of himself, doctors, in the last extreme act, should teach and transmit this with the help of psychologists towards the "gentle death".
To date death has almost been a horrible thing.
Man was a victim, but the fault is ours.
Right to Life - The Right to Love - Human rights according to Prophetism.
Universal Declaration of human rights according to Prophetism
Now it's good that I talk you about how the web Prophetism conceives human rights; I'm going to talk about Our Declaration of human rights.
In the end the Declaration of human rights points out the fact that the humanity still lives subject to many forms of slavery
Otherwise there should not be such a Declaration. The same need to have it, proves that man has been deceived for thousands of years.
And he has been deceived in such a cunning way, that only his rising above the humanity can destroy the invisible chains that imprison him, the limits and the invisible prisons in which he is forced.
Our" Declaration includes ten main issues.
-The first is the Right to Life
Man is entitled to the dignity to grow in order to bloom until his supreme flowering.
Because this bloom is his right. Man comes in the form of seed (egg and sperm) but society does not provide him the right soil, the right attentions, an atmosphere of love.
Instead, society has deeply poisoned atmosphere, full of anger, hatred, destruction, violence, war.
The right to life implies that there are no more wars.
Everyone must have the right to refuse. But up to present this right does not exist.
Civilized society does not exist
I thought on human rights, specifically my thoughts as a prophet of the net, then lit on men, is shipwrecked on the so called United Nations, and on human rights day.
We must not forget a basic fact: we live in a hypocritical society.
A great philosopher was asked what he thought of civility, he answered precisely like this: "it's a good idea, but someone needs to turn the idea into reality. Civilization does not exist yet, despite what one thinks. It's a dream into the future. "
People who hold the power -political, religious and social, are in charge because civility has not been realized, the reason is simple: a civilized world, mature men,
do not need countries-all borders are false-
they do not need religions, because all these are fictions.
Look at the people who have been holding power for thousands of years-priests, politicians, multinational corporations, tycoons- they have all the means to prevent human evolution.
And the best way to prevent evolution is to convince man that he is civilized, convince him that he is already a human being, that there is no need to experience a transformation process.
When one comes to Sin, one must disturb the religion, because the "sin" is the only conscious and voluntary transgression of the Divine law, in everyday language we speak of guilt.
In granting the Jewish Theological thinking, but also in the Muslim religion-Christian, sin is mainly in harmony with disobedience to the divine will, as from what is believed to be the cause of original sin, Adam disobedience; the Buddhist philosophy of life thinks in a completely different way, it draws its dogma from brahaminica philosophy and holds that man cannot escape the cycle of cause - effect law and makes no mention to the sin as thought by Catholic Christian religion.
In the Jewish tradition, however, this act was not considered to be a “original” sin inherited by all descendants of Adam, but only such as the first sin, not necessarily working even in Adam's descendants.
The common element is the idea that the disobedience to God's Commandments is sin itself, whatever the commandments themselves are; nor this may be surprising, if we bear in mind that, in the corresponding part of the biblical story, God is conceived as rigid authority, along the lines of a King, of oriental Kings.
In this way the feudal Church taught people to fear not only the authority in the person of officials responsible for enforcing the laws (right or wrong) because they have weapons.
One such fear, as sin, would not be sufficient guarantee for the proper functioning of the State.
I want to evoke the historical personality of Gandhi, so similar to that of Jesus; you should not forget what he actually taught, not what they would make him to say.
In his diary, “old as mountains: the truth and non-violence,” he says, “if I had to choose between armed struggle and cowardice, the truth teaches me to choose armed struggle; but just because I'm a follower of truth, the truth, when there is no cowardice and there is awareness and courage, teach me the path of non-violence”.
In the same spirit, when he was reported that a small population without defending had been massacred, involving the same children, to honour the principle of non-violence; Gandhi regretted the false and erroneous interpretation of this principle, saying that non-violence was a free choice and not a reasoned position taken arbitrary, it is the best method of fighting under condition of maturity and awareness, a risk accepted with courage, but one could not oblige the children, the weak and the helpless and all those, who had no opportunity to choose to be involved in the ultimate sacrifice that went beyond self-defence.
If society wants to live better, it must give birth to a New Man, but it takes a substantial change in the human behaviour, that is from the passage of preponderance, namely greater strength or importance of having, in selfish mode, the mode of being.
To save us from the psychological and economic catastrophe, for the common good, you have to ask yourself:
is it really possible a behavioural transformation on a large scale?
And if it is possible, we ask ourselves, how to produce it?
Here we are helped by the Prophecy on a large scale on the web, so that more people are aware of what to do.
In my opinion, human character, if one wants to make the mass social component evolve, can change provided that the following conditions are met.
The main points are four,
- first: be aware (awareness) of the State of suffering in which selfish humanity lives;
- Second: recognize the origin of our and others' discomfort;
- Third, admit honestly that there is another way (at the very least you can do that) to overcome the discomfort itself;
- Fourth: full accept the idea that, to overcome our discomfort, our discomfort, especially in too many social inequalities, we must accept our certain ideologies and certain rules of life and change the current way of life.
I have not made up anything, these four points correspond to the four noble truths of Buddha's teaching, rather they are the pillars on which this doctrine is established, related to the conditions of human existence, only on specific cases of human illness due to particular individual or social circumstance, are they not applied?
But come closer to us, the same principle, it is understood also to Marxist idea of salvation.
Power and limits of fanatic doctrines.
The power and the strength of a community does not only depend on the members or components and on their number, but very much on the economic component, but even more on the doctrine that prophesies and that everyone carries out. Let's see therefore how a fanatical doctrine (and we see even today with the Isis) often increases a community's power.
Today they are trendy, perhaps more than before, their influence on power has great practical importance, so a nation or group of fanatics has odds of success in war, this is a major impediment to democracy and democratic peoples in general; it has more success than a nation where there is a large population of wise men.
Consider this in the light of history.
It is possible to note that cases in which fanaticism led to success are much more known than those in which they failed, because these events remained in the dark.
Certainly a too quickly examination can mislead; it is obvious that if we stay on our guard is easy to avoid it.
A classic example of the fanatic power was that of Hitler's national socialism, but today we have to remember that the maximum fanatic power example is represented by the history of Islam.
Muhammad did not ever add anything to the knowledge and material resources of the Arabs, yet few years after his death they had acquired a vast empire by defeating the powerful neighbours; the religion founded by the Prophet was material and essential element to the success of the nation.
In this paragraph I shall talk about animist nomadism and its myths: over the course of history, it is rooted in the Period of Origins, when neither the State nor the Class Properties existed, while the Law of Life ruled over the world, intended as the Word which conveys the interests of the Weak, together with rationality, novelty and true spiritual paternity.
"Spirituality" should not countervail the body and the matter; the concept of Spirit has been pathologically divulgated by the developing religions, however, we intend Spirit as a form of love for each kind of matter, for all the bodies even without blood ties, since they all share the same Cosmic Origin, they all belong to the same cosmic body.
In this sense, within nomadic animism, hospitality is extremely important: any foreigner (without any blood tie) is sacred, the outcasts are gladly welcomed, because they are the "future God" which brings novelty and happiness (as evidenced by all the nomadic, Hellenic, Jewish and Native American traditions.)
Only following the path "of the last who shall be first, and the first last" (thus avoiding the concept of “last”, “first”, “coincidence” and “removal of opposites”), we can feel universal love, which will enable us to love and help both our friends and enemies looking for humanization; just like the sun, we shall spread light, life and warmth not only to our friends, but also to the secret needs of our enemies.
However, the "turn the other cheek" motto refers exclusively to those who have "another cheek," but the poor, conversely, have none.
Therefore, this ethical motto addresses especially the authorities and the rich, those who have the choice and means to freely act; it does not refer to those who live outside a “moral context" and have no freedom to choose their means and acquire knowledge: this truth must be revealed to all the theologians, wise men, politicians and "non-violent" activists (in words) of the world; to all the priests, and bishops who address the humiliated and offended masses, to all the poor Lazarus in Africa, Latin America and the whole world.
Moreover, the authorities, in the true sense of the word, should comply with the provisions of the Gospel – especially with the Parable of the "Prodigal Son" - and adhere to the Canticle of Mary, mother of Jesus.
The love of the prophets, of these men guided by love, springs from the path taken by Prophet Abraham, the father of all the prophets.
A heart full of love is the result of intelligence, strength-knowledge, and acts against any supremacy; it precisely arises from the unity of life stating that
"The true worship of God means breaking the yoke around the neck of the oppressed and set the slaves free" (Isaiah the prophet, 58), i.e. it stems from an agreement established with the poor, the oppressed and the last in the whole world.
The Victory of Prophetism – The presence of the Great Light
This website has been shaped like a magic object, like "Aladdin's lamp", similar to the work of an alchemist who - while changing the "matter" – transforms himself and the surrounding world, like a mirror reflecting himself in the world and a mirror reflecting the world inside him.
It was actually fashioned like the work of a shaman, who uses wood to manufacture his amulet, his winning and living sword; the magic "Pinocchio."
Similarly, the magic and powerful wand of Moses and Aaron was made;
namely, we forge and create things starting from our thoughts and hands, using invisible hands, our shield and spear of sovereign power.
This culminates with the creation, as shamans do, with "wood and clay" of a new creature, a renovated modern prophet, a creature of light, the "Mask", a synergy with your "Doppelgänger", a winning match against the powerful: this is the power of thoughts and words through the network, and is the winning match against the "Powerful" and the "Rulers", it is a banquet of love together with "the Poor" of the whole world, thus supporting the soul of the “poor in spirit" now tired of fighting.
Animism is a power of the soul, its effect on men is always positive, somehow divine.
But what is soul?
It is the spiritual component of men in contrast to their body; it has nothing to do with mind and intellect, or with heart and feelings, as the ancient animists and the modern psychology of the unconscious believe.
The recognition of a living entity inside men able to survive after their death is a form of animism.
All that is beautiful, magnanimous and altruistic comes neither from the cold reason, nor from the emotional heart, but rather from the soul.
The belief in the existence of a human soul preceded the conviction in the existence of one or multiple gods.
It is the animistic component of men which urges them to save the life of another man in peril at the expense of their own interest or life: reason immediately highlights fears or any possible danger and eventually withdraws, while the heart intervenes only if it is emotionally engaged.
Now, if we go back to the soul, we shall realise that all the so-called "primitive" people (even if, from an animistic point of you, we are the true primitive men!), such as the indigenous peoples of the Americas and the Andean peoples, firmly believed in the existence of a spirit which lived not only in men but also in objects and non-human beings (animals); therefore it can be regarded in my opinion, as a condition preceding the belief in the existence of a human soul.
Over the life cycle of men and books, in particular of those dealing with life like this one, the final chapter and the closing sentence are - perhaps coincidentally - the most important steps. Probably some articles have succeeded, albeit marginally, in addressing or inspiring some readers, therefore I would like to add: "Upon the drafting of this text, I listened to my heart, which in turn answered the call of our troubled time! Therefore, I decided to subject our works to constant scientific checks in order to emphasise the substance and content, and now I would like to let my heart talk about the importance of "word" and "time" within modern prophetism.
Politics and Religion should be simple: I do not mean that they are easy, but they are not complicated, life is not complicated; all the difficulties arise from the mind, which – if left free to run – tends to prevail over the others.
Politicians and philosophers find it very difficult – sometimes impossible - to become humanists (i.e.: to love mankind), since the deeper the knowledge, the greater the difficulty, but the difficulty depends on us; we create it by means of power and money, but complexity cannot match with simplicity, with love.
We are living in the technological era, but each situation features other three sides. To the detriment of our personality, our technological society has created the ingenious monstrosity of the group - a downside to be constantly controlled – together with the social "slave - master" hierarchy, while socialist, animist, nomadic societies pay little attention to the accumulative production of the group, but rather focus on the magic, artistic and dreamy creativity of all the group members.
The animist - nomadic approach takes inspiration from the birds in the sky and the lilies in the fields, and uses technology as a work instrument.