|
|
|
In this article, I would like to focus on Violence and provide an insight into all its various aspects.
It goes without saying that the approach to violence takes on either an objective or a subjective connotation depending on the subjects who use violence, i.e. the oppressed or the ruling class.
Put simply, it is impossible to equate the violence of the "Settler" with the violence of the "Colonized person": the violence of the Settler against the Colonised person and the violence of the latter against the former; these "two" kinds of violence are clearly distinct.
In fact, the violence of the Rich and the violence of the Poor are not the same thing: the Poor actually fight against the root of the power and try to redeem themselves from the violence suffered, which in turn addresses the weak and urges the poor to put the blame for their failure on the lowest, forever repeating the reasons underlying their own failure and oppression.
Obviously, the violence of the Poor who wants to take the place of the rich, thus vexing those who are equally poor or even poorer, looks like the violence of the Rich, since it is based on the same feelings of envy, oppression, grudge and revenge.
This behaviour feeds the violence of the Rich and is also responsible for it.
This violence-revenge does not express the urgency to totally overcome one’s status of exploited or exploiter, as the "grudge" does not rely on "the Last will be the First, and the First will be the Last, so that there will be neither First nor Last."
However, from a logical point of view, the violence used by the "Rich" is different, because the rich can draw on countless resources to act in the name of beauty, magnanimity, mercy, pity and in harmony with the whole world, while the Servants are needy and deprived of the enlightened rationality, therefore they are generally less free and aware than the Rich or even than those who are neither rich nor poor, but released from opposing antagonisms.
We have been asked: "How many people write articles about Modern Prophetism? And then, can you tell us something more about love, considering that you talk about it in every article?" A. My answer begins with this assertion: We are one, no one and one…
|
Love is an encounter, an orgasmic match, between death and life. If you do not know love, then you will ignore the meaning of life. You were born, you have lived, you have died ... but you still ignore it. You know nothing about the…
|
The second step towards the love is to learn changing your poison into honey… Many people love, but their love is deeply contaminated by poison: hate, jealousy, anger, possessiveness. Your love is surrounded by a thousand and a poison! Love is something delicate: you think…
|
|
Never as it is in this age it is important to love. Because when we truly love, we can deeply know other people and ourselves. The body can surrender to the injuries of the age, but our spirit, when it loves, or better when it…
|
|
The fourth step: be nothing. When you start thinking about being someone, you block yourselves; thus, love cannot flow., Love can flow only from that one who is nothing. Love only live in nothing. When you are empty, love is present. When you are full…
|
|
Modern Prophets - Principles of Humanistic Logic
|